Showing posts with label Guest Speaker Talks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guest Speaker Talks. Show all posts

Monday, 11 February 2013

Bronwyn Platten Guest Speaker for Working with Diverse Audiences Nov 2012


Since 1985, Bronwyn Platten has worked extensively on creative projects with diverse community groups including people with multiple disabilities and psychiatric illnesses. From 2003-08, she was employed by NHS Trusts as an artist, curator and project manager.

In her work in arts in healthcare she is especially interested in researching the value of multi-sensory creative interventions and interdisciplinary research in the field of person centred care. Bronwyn has been awarded her doctorate in 2012 from The University of Salford for, Mouths and Meaning, a collaborative multi-sensory arts in healthcare research project which explores the experience of embodiment for people who have been affected by an eating disorder.
Bronwyn Platten is an Australian artist, based in the United Kingdom since 2001. She is interested in creatively exploring the influences of sexuality, identity and gender upon perceptions of body image and experiences of embodiment.
www.bronwynplatten.com
www.imaginalregions.co.uk

Here Bronwyn gives a summary of the talk she gave us at Fabrica...


Talk for Fabrica Gallery, Brighton November 19/11/12
Naomi Kendrick in conjunction with Fabrica invited me to present on my approach as a contemporary visual artist in reflection upon the way that I work with diverse audiences.
I first met Naomi when I took part in her “What is a multi-sensory intervention?” at the Manchester Art Gallery in 2009. Her own work in this area has been influential in my own recent research to engage people who have been affected by an eating disorder. My talk that I describe below, sought to summarise some of motivations for working with others along with the relevance of utilizing a multi-sensory approach in healthcare contexts. As well, I was hoping to articulate some of the challenges, benefits and insights that appear particular for artists working with potentially vulnerable people.

The talk at Fabrica began with a screening of Untitled 2011 a film made with Sarah Coggrave and filmed and edited by Insa Langhorst. You can see the film by going to this link:

http://vimeo.com/18043765

I followed the short screening with some examples of artworks that I have made with other people during my work in community settings and in arts in health contexts. 

In my work with others, I am especially interested to support people to share their own stories and experiences particularly for people who may not have had the opportunity to do so, or feel that their voice may not be listened to. One of the examples that I showed, were photographs of Bruce Rodenrys’s pages from his photo albums. The photographs were shown as part of the 1998 Biennale of Sydney. Bruce is someone that I have worked with for over twelve years. He has an intellectual disability, speaks only a few words and at the time was resident in an institution that provided supported care. The photographs of his work are unusual, in that would not be the kind of artworks that are easily accessed by the mainstream art world given that Bruce lives in relative isolation. Bruce would perhaps fit the definition of an ‘outsider’ artist. I described how the project between us – my facilitation of his work and its inclusion in a significant exhibition and gallery – the Museum of Contemporary Art articulates something of the ethical dilemmas associated with working with vulnerable people.

My intention at the time was to simply document selected pages from Bruce’s albums. I had his approval to do this and felt that people would find it interesting to see the way in which he collates his interests and passions and in so doing communicates to others his perception of the world.  From my observation his interests in no particular order include: buildings; bodies; faces; objects; fatness; drink can collecting, and belly buttons. What also struck me, was by way of its visible absence, Bruce critiques the current obsession with thinness. In fact, after viewing his photo albums, in my experience the world can appear profoundly anorectic.

I described the dilemma that I faced in establishing this project. As I said earlier, I had hoped that the reproduction of the pages would offer insights for viewers as to different ways of being in the world. Perhaps too, the photographs may break down some of the experiences of social marginalisation that people with an intellectual disability face via the opportunity for shared communication. However, with art there is always many ways to interpret the work and its meaning. Comments from the viewing public included expressions of interest in Bruce’s pages from his photo albums. Whilst I was careful to include Bruce there were also assumptions that I was taking advantage – furthering my career via my work with him and other artists with a disability. In the talk I explained how influential this experience had been for me in terms of taking subsequently more care in art projects with vulnerable people to articulate clearly the nature of the shared involvement. Furthermore I recognised the need to foresee and address any potential ethical ambiguities and issues of copyright and informed consent that may arise.

From here I discussed a little more about my work with people in various social contexts, work with people with special needs or intellectual disabilities, and also in healthcare where I have worked as a curator, artist and project manager for NHS trusts in Aberdeen and Manchester.

In reflecting on my work as an artist, arts worker with communities and artist and curator in healthcare settings I have become more and more interested in artists’ abilities to engage directly with embodied experience of illness. For instance I mentioned Jo Spence (1934-1992) who explored and documented via photography her experience of treatment for cancer.  I perceive that such awareness and expertise is commonly been left out the medical knowledge of bodies and illness. As an artist who as an adolescent and young adult who had encountered an eating disorder, I was aware of the very engaging artworks that have been created by artists to negotiate lived experience of eating and embodiment in relation to an eating disorder. I mentioned the work of Janine Antoni, whom in her work Gnaw from 1992 chewed on vast blocks of lard and chocolate, collected the spat out chewed lumps and reshaped them as commodities such as I noticed that while the arts are regularly evidenced as a way to improve the built environs of the hospital or as creative participatory methods for patients towards improving wellbeing it is less familiar to use art to explore the experience of illness to directly to inform understanding of those who treat illness.

In 2008 I was awarded a bursary to undertake doctoral research in arts in healthcare as part of HaCIRIC – Health and Care Infrastructure Research and Innovation Centre, School of The Built Environment, The University of Salford. My research sought to bring together my previous experience in community engagement, the NHS, with my own interest in exploring embodiment via arts based practice. I called the research project Mouths and Meaning. My interest in mouths was initially inspired by my own encounter with anorexia nervosa and bulimia. While I had undergone therapeutic treatment, my own embodied experiences were left unexamined. Embarking on a career as an artist, I found ways to explore and express my experience of eating disorders through consciously connecting my own embodiment to my then lived experience of the world. The interwoven nature of identity and embodiment is something that is often taken for granted, but not so for someone recovering from an eating disorder. For every aspect of bodily experience is affected by the illness and in turn, transforms the nature of daily life and social relationships. For me, my mouth was inextricably linked to the experience of my eating disorders and to my recovery. Mouths and Meaning grew out of the desire to investigate with others whether my own experiences and insights provided a model for engaging the mouth differently, and if so, in what ways.

Here I showed some earlier works that convey my own experience of exploring embodiment in relationship to my mouth, food and eating. The pictured work The Kissing Table, 1993 explores the mouth as symbolic and pleasure-filled and as liminal. For the mouth is both connected to the interior and exterior of the body, is both inside and outside, the mouth incorporates the outside to the inside but it also expels what is inside - outside. Our mouths have multiple roles in sensing tastes determines edible pleasures and disgust while being actively involved in acts of social communication – talking, kissing, sharing food, or alternatively not speaking, or not eating.

I provide a summary of Mouths and Meaning as a research project below:

Mouths and Meaning uses a multisensory, inclusive and interdisciplinary approach to creatively explore experiences of food, eating and embodiment by those who have been affected by an eating disorder.

I introduced some of the reasons as to why I was interested to explore experience of eating disorders particularly via a multi-sensory participatory approach.

There is no single cause contributing to the onset of an eating disorder – yet embodiment of those affected is largely understood as a preoccupation with body shape.

By the term embodiment I mean the ways in which all of our experiences, our daily lives are sensed, interpreted and communicated in and through our bodies. Susie Orbach describes how our bodies have become sites of anxiety, we now work on our bodies utilising exercise regimes, diets and or surgical procedures, in ways that we hope will make us feel better about ourselves. She makes a ‘plea to rethink the body in such a way that we can both take it for granted and enjoy it.’ (Orbach, 2009:145). How to do this was something my research sought to explore.

At the beginning of my research I was also fortunate to be invited to attend Naomi Kendrick’s ‘What is a sensory intervention?’ 2009, the Manchester Art Gallery. Naomi’s work and research in the area of multi-sensory participatory practice has been inspirational for me. Naomi’s approach offers some effective, interesting and fun ways to invite others to engage across all the senses.

Multi-sensory practice, I saw as resonant with the ways I had been intuitively through my own practice being exploring my personal experience of embodiment. I hoped that others could who had been affected by an eating disorder, could be supported through such a creative approach to consider bodily experiences beyond just viewing their body as an object predominantly via appearance and body shape. My challenge with Mouths and Meaning was to find ways to shift from the common preoccupations with visual appearances of the body towards representing people’s lived experiences of their embodiment. I also hoped that perhaps a multi-sensory arts based research project such as Mouths and Meaning could support people to engage the senses more equally and in so doing connect with their bodies more deeply and holistically.

As the process of embodiment is of its nature an intensely personal experience, I sought to design and facilitate experiential multisensory workshops that could optimize that aspect for the participants. For instance senses such as touch and taste locate sensory experience inside the interior body while vision tends to be considered as a distant sense. As example, when we look – we look with our eyes ‘out’ from our bodies. So perhaps then it is of now surprise that it is easier to describe bodies via the eyes than the more internalised and taken for granted senses and harder to replicate senses such as touch and taste. Multi-sensory experiences were initially developed in my studio, and involved practices I adapted from earlier artworks to draw the interior of my mouth. I experimented with doing drawings of my interior mouth with my eyes open and then with them closed. I even tried drawing the interior of my mouth using my computer mouse. My interest was to seek to represent my own particular relationship/ feeling/ quality of my mouth as sensed internally.

Wanting to invite others to explore their own relationship to their mouths and to make Mouths and Meaning a holistic engagement of the senses and embodiment, I included perceptual activities: the slow drinking of a cup of water and a series of movements of the tongue that I had learnt and used successfully to release jaw tension. These quiet and slow sensings, that engaged the interior of the mouth became a precursor to the mouth drawing activity. I showed some images that people had created of drawing the interior of their mouths with their eyes closed. Over 300 people have now taken part in the workshops. However no one has been identified in terms of whether they have had an eating disorder or any challenges with food. Rather the workshop has formed an aid for people to consider their embodiment in different ways such as is possible via connecting with the inside of one’s body via the interior mouth. People were encouraged to consider the experience in any way that they wished.

From here I described the longer-term co-collaboration with Sarah Coggrave with whom I worked with for over a year as part of the Mouths and Meaning project. Sarah, who when we first met in 2009 was then in recovery from an eating disorder. She has held a long-term interest in art and indeed shortly after we started working together began an art foundation course and is currently doing a BA in Visual Arts. The first part of the process of our shared working together involved exploring a range of multi-sensory experiences that we selected together including drawing with our eyes closed while listening to favourite pieces of music, experimenting with sound making and recording, visiting a sweet shop and making sculptures out of sweets. Here is our first collaborative artwork.

One of the activities we undertook together was based on one I undertook as a child and recreated as part of my PhD exploration. It involved mixing soil and water together in a metal bucket and stirring in personally selected items of food, plant materials and discarded found things such as eggshells and coffee grounds from the compost heap. I recognise something important in the ways that when as children we engage in experiments with the materials of the environment around us. Play forms an important part of how we learn about the material and sensorial nature of our own bodily being and about being in the world. Perhaps even as adults this taken for granted way of being in its multi-sensory spontaneity can be useful to reconsider a different kind of embodiment – one closer to Orbach’s sense of the body as something we can take pleasure in but also take for granted too. I also suggest that the pleasure of play, of having fun and exploring mulit-sensorial experiences could be highly valuable to consider a more holistic approach to the treatment of eating disorders. Particularly as a way to acknowledge unspoken, material and bodily aspects of the day-to-day experience of living with an eating disorder.

I had described to Sarah the nature of the potion/ mixture making process as I had undertaken it as a child as well as other artworks that I had made as an artist. Sarah suggested that she would be keen to explore the mixture making activity too. We ended up filming our shared exploration in a favourite landscape of Sarah’s. This is the film that I showed at the beginning of the talk (see link above). I recognise this playful experience as early ‘cooking’ and also as a multi-sensory pleasure but also as something dark and mysterious. Sarah expressed that the process allowed us to explore in non-judgemental ways without the requirement that anything be created as result. Also that for Sarah, the process linked her to nature and to the natural environment.

Finally, I showed the major filmed performance work that Sarah and I created together, Untitled (The Party) 2011. Sarah had the idea of recreating her experience of a childhood party. I had had a vision of applying whipped cream from a piping bag to a women’s head so that it formed a circle round her head like a halo. I also envisioned filling my own shoes with whipped cream and put my feet into them. Sarah expressed the desire to do this too – only she wanted to wear Wellington boots. We combined our varying visions and shared engagement including a short sound improvisation by me at the beginning of the film. In the performance we have a food fight, dance together to music, draw with food and have a lot of fun and laughs.

Rather than try and analyse this performance in depth, or any of the works that have been created as part of Mouths and Meaning I read out some of the comments that viewers of the exhibition elicited either via the gallery comments book, by written letter or online blogs.

“I am a scientist – What is the message?”

“A surprisingly moving experience for me
- very physical I thought I might be sick and also had to fight not to cry.
It has made me think about the meaning of (my) life – thank you ( I think!)”

‘Sarah and Platten have overturned the received wisdom … and illustrated the potential therapeutic value of adjusting to a rather different focus when attempting to understand and support those in our communities who battle daily with varying degrees of eating disorder.’

(Dr. J Morgan, Community Psychiatrist involved in the treatment of people with an eating disorder)

I also read out a discussion that I discovered on Mumsnet about Mouths and Meaning and some of the featured works. The discussion was really compelling as some of the women who made comments were really liberated by their experiences of perceiving the artwork while others were disgusted and sickened. Given that these women were either currently negotiating an eating disorder or in recovery, their varying comments underline how there is no ‘right’ approach to representing the experience of an eating disorder. Each experience is distinct for each individual. Also, the varying comments explain just how sensitive people affected by an eating disorder are to material distinctions and the nature of food and its incorporation into the body. Undoubtedly, multi-sensory approaches are invaluable towards gathering understanding of people’s individual lived experiences of embodiment. However, it is really important that such approaches are established with care and insight and respect for all those involved.

Following the presentation there was time for questions and comments.

One comment that was raised that was really pertinent relates to the interconnection of with the processes of Mouths and Meaning as a form of therapy. In reply I explained how I am not a therapist and cannot claim to be one. To do so would be unethical. Nor do I wish to take on this role. I am aware that being an artist can be a way of allowing others to engage more openly and perhaps more equally than is possible with someone who’s role is defined by being a therapist. However, such processes as those involved in Mouths and Meaning as well as Naomi Kendrick’s work in multi-sensory participatory processes perhaps straddle across art and art as a form a therapy. As comments raised by the audience at Fabrica suggest, engaging in art practice can also afford therapeutic benefits while not necessarily intending to be therapy. I am interested to question and further understand the distinctions and commonalities that exist between art and art as form of therapy.

Other comments from the audience stressed the very intimate nature of the collaboration. One person proposed that for Sarah and myself to have engaged in such a close and prolonged collaboration that we would really have had to trust each other. This is an aspect of our shared collaborative work that Sarah and I wholeheartedly agree with. We are planning to write an account together that records the development of our mutual and individual experiences that has informed our collaborative approach. I reflected that I feel I have been able to trust Sarah implicitly which is something that has been established through the way we not only have shared all the decisions but also have been able to question and include each other in our decision making. Also, and I think this is important – we share ownership of the collaborative works we have created together and the associated knowledge we have developed. To this end we have contractual agreements that identify our joint ownership of our collaborative art works.

For further information my work and the research project and exhibition Mouths and Meaning Go to:

www.bronwynplatten.com


Monday, 2 April 2012

Working with Diverse Audiences - April 2012 Timetable

Working with Diverse Audiences

Fabrica presents a series of practice sharing events for artists and other professionals working with the arts in health, social care, education and gallery settings. 
Jointly devised by Liz Whitehead, a Co-director of Fabrica gallery, and artist Naomi Kendrick, the programme sets out to explore various approaches to working with diverse audiences, using the contemporary visual arts.

The programme draws directly on Naomi’s research into and practice of a multisensory approach to engaging with people about contemporary art.  It also draws on the perspectives of other artists, researchers, social care and health professionals, to articulate the challenges and opportunities particular to these contexts – both for artists and participants.

Working with Diverse Audiences comprises workshops, professional presentations and peer critique sessions. It is aimed at giving participants a rounded learning experience, and encouraging best practice.

APRIL 2012 TIMETABLE

Saturday 21 April, 9.30pm-1.30pm - A Multi-sensory Approach. £5 including lunch. (Takes place at Friends Meeting House) This half-day workshop is designed as a practical introduction to Naomi’s multi-sensory method, why this method is useful for working with a diverse group and as a way of encouraging participants to think more directly and personally about the many ways an exhibition can be interpreted and explored.

Monday 23 April, 1.30-3pm and Tuesday 24 November, 1.30-3pm - Second Sight. Free entry.
Second Sight workshops are regular events in Fabrica’s education programme – two events take place per exhibition.  Led by Naomi Kendrick, the workshops explore the current exhibition through an audio described tour, and through sound, touch, smell, and group discussion.
We invite professionals to join these workshops like any other participant, and after the workshop there will be a chance to take part in a short discussion about their experience of the workshop.

Monday 23 April, 7-9pm - Professional Practice Presentation – Lucinda Jarrett. Free entry. 
Lucinda Jarrett is artistic director of Rosetta Life. She founded the organisation in 1997 in order to challenge our contemporary representation of illness and to enable people who are facing death to participate more fully in cultural life. Lucinda worked in television for five years as associate television producer for French, American and British broadcasters, before founding Rosetta Life. She is a published writer and poet, has a strong track record of delivering theatre within healthcare settings, and has worked with independent dancers and is a founder member of the Living Body alliance, a network of movement practitioners working in End of Life Care. She is currently holder of a Wellcome Trust Clore Leadership Fellowship exploring arts as a tool for advocacy and public engagement.

Tuesday 24 November 5-7pm - Working With Diverse Audiences Peer Critique. £5 (including refreshments). These sessions are for those who have attended at least one Second Sight workshop and/or A Multisensory Approach workshop. The sessions provide a space for discussion about participants’ current practice and working environment, and as a way of participants generating ideas to be taken forward.

For further information, or to book for any of the events contact clare.hankinson@fabrica.org.uk or phone 01273 778646


Tuesday, 28 February 2012

Working with Diverse Audiences Nov 2011 - Dr Amanda Ravetz Guest Speaker Talk

Artist Peter Goode (on screen during Amanda's Talk)
 A Kind of Making – A talk at Fabrica Gallery
Amanda Ravetz


I began the talk by showing a twenty minute film I made in 1996. Peter’s Stone God is about the artist Peter Goode. It begins with a scene of Peter carving a length of wood found in the canal – the only sounds are of him carving. Over the course of a couple of minutes, we witness his tactile relationship with the emerging form. This is followed by a scene of Peter in his living room talking about his journey over the past 12 years which has involved trying to read and write. He says he is severely dyslexic and that nothing he has tried (group classes, writing groups etc.) has worked. He adds that a couple of people have said to him ‘you wouldn’t be like you are [an artist] if you could read and write’, but he says he considers this a copout – why can’t he be like everyone else? It must be that he doesn’t try hard enough, he adds.

As the film unfolds we see Peter’s developing relationship with the carving which he calls The Guardian. We also find out about his poetry  which we see being scribed for him by a friend who reads his letters out to him including one to say that a poem is being published in a collection; towards the end of the film we see Peter at a Christmas party with other writers where he struggles to read one of his poems aloud.

The film ends with an insight into Peter’s emotions on completing the sculpture. He reflects on their journey together. The poem Stone God is read again (as a voiceover) by someone who read it at his request at the Christmas Party.

This was the first film I made during the MA in Visual Anthropology which I completed at the University of Manchester. In some ways it is a funny film to choose to show at a public talk as technically its very poor  quality, having been made on a VHS analogue editing system, at the beginning the course. But I showed because it lays out many of the issues that are still central in my work.

I asked the audience (of about 15 people) to respond to the film – what had they thought and felt while watching it? There were lots of mixed and interesting comments. Then I explained that I see the film as emblematic of themes I always come back to:

- making,  as this relates to physical materials, to relationships b/w people and the environment, and to the craft of video;

- a certain kind of filmmaking, observational cinema - which I and others consider especially attuned to the senses; but which also raises questions, dilemmas, issues about power and authorship and about relationships between those being videoed, filmmaker and  audiences;

- experiences of reverie, play, and improvisation that I find are sometimes induced by experiences of making. 

Video and making
Peter’s God focused on material making – that was what I was interested in finding out about and drawn to.

In the next part of the talk I said more about observational cinema and how I came to think of it also as a kind of making,  It involves following rather than  directing or recreating scenes, and it relies on close relationships with the  protagonists, a particular kind of attention to ways of being in the world – to material as well as other relationships; long takes. Observational Cinema (OC) follows a Bazanian aesthetic and philosophy meaning its not about dissecting reality or producing meaning through  cuts and juxtapositions – montage – but about a continuous practice, about responding in the moment, while also having an understanding of social and political context. (for more on this see Observational Cinema: anthropology, film and the exploration of social life by Anna Grimshaw and myself (Indiana 2009).

The Bracewells
In some respects observational cinema relates closely to participant observation – the central method of a certain kind of anthropology which is immersive, durational, qualitative, developed through relationships with people at the same time as paying attention to cultural differences, political structures, dissonant information and so on. The approach places emphasis on the body of the filmmaker and the senses – how you move, proximity and distance, sound, visual appearances and touch are all relevant when using a medium that is indexical, that records your movements as well as those of your subject. This is not to say text cannot do these things, or that film cannot be used in ways that suppress these qualities, but they have a kind of primacy in this strand of filmmaking. 

Next I talked about how I continued at U of M after the masters with a PhD in Anthropology  with visual media. My fieldwork was in Todmorden, where I was living and involved 3 sites – a factory, a farm and a housing estate.

My PhD film The Bracewells, was shot in 1998 and edited in 2000.

Click here to see 'The Bracewells' http://vimeo.com/33465829

I found out through this film and the fieldwork I did immediately before it on a housing estate that OC is suited to some, but not all, situations and this gave me an important way of understanding more about my research questions.

It turned out that OC was well suited to the research I was doing with farmers – a number of things about it that fitted with their sensory practices and knowledge. It was possible to use the approach in a way tuned to the senses. For example, what I was doing with the camera was not dissimilar from what the Bracewell’s were doing themselves – movement, rhythm, touch, smell, looking and listening were central to their daily work. So my use of OC allowed me to stay close to these rhythms.

This did not mean I wasn’t on the look out for larger social ad political contexts in which they were doing this kind of work. For example there was a kind of bureaucratic knowledge they were increasingly being asked to use at this time of BSE. These two kinds of knowledge not always comfortable together – in a scene when a woman from MAFF comes to do a spot check you can see difficulty.

Making the Bracewells helped me see that my  preferred filmmaking was about achieving a shared presence in an environment; and the making involved in  editing was about maintaining a semblance of this in the finished film – though shared presence in a way that doesn’t eliminate difference, but makes it possible to relate across difference.

But just before this, I’d been on housing estate and had a really different experience there of trying to use OC which showed me that this approach is not appropriate to all situations. In particular I found that in this environment the  camera was viewed  overwhelmingly as a mode of surveillance.

Here is an extract from my fieldnotes:

Art and craft. T and D watched football video while I played with Ts daughter R outside. Later art and craft parents and toddlers. Everyone tense and R and K fighting. S is not here today and I didn’t have the camera pointed at them or on at this point, but felt tension between censoring reality and not wanting to record things that expose or objectify T and C. or things that will make them vulnerable to outside criticism – they’ve had their children taken away and T is working towards getting R back fulltime. First of a number of difficult issues that came up about video today .

A lot of filming happened during this time and of all different kinds  - participatory, OC, and the girls filming things they wanted to – often one another - because much of the time I was driving them to different places – shopping, court, social services, relatives and so on, and of course I couldn’t film at the same time. But I was unwilling to use this material in the end because it I thought it was objectifying. Instead I wrote about the estate.

Extract from thesis

We all leave Cheryl's and set off down the snicket. It’s a sultry day. Just now, lying in
Cheryl's doorway, Cath remarked on the white clouds delicately suspended in the sky and for a few moments there was a stillness and calm amongst us. Now, as I follow Tina and Cath, Deanna, Vron, Mat and Anne along the path the muscles in my stomach tighten again.

Tina is drunk and noisy. She swaggers along, laying claim to the Avvie even though she has been banned from here by the conditions of her bail. I struggle momentarily with the desire to take the downhill road that leads to my house, but instead I follow the others into Tina's dad's house. Sitting in the small front room Mat draws attention to his sister Rachel who appears on the road above us. She is a thin, wiry nine year old wearing a short skirt, tottering on black patent shoes with 2 inch heels. She comes down the path, into the living room and springs catlike on to Deanna's knee. Tina is eating an egg sandwich she has just made in the kitchen and tells Rachel to leave the room as she isn't invited. Rachel taunts Tina back and soon they are chasing each other round the cramped room. For a moment or two the fight is a perfectly
choreographed performance but Tina is easily riled and tells Rachel angrily to ‘f’ off.

Rachel flies at her, arms and legs flailing, her nine year old body making little impact. Cheryl sits a little uneasily smiling, her eyes worried, betraying the unspoken feeling that Tina bullies all of us and that it is only this child who stands up to her. Tina opens the back door and pushes the child out, locking it behind her and laughing loudly.

'She'll come round the front now' says Vron. 'What's she like, little bitch!' her voice thick with maternal pride.

The front door rattles as Rachel tries to force her way through, then reappearing again at the back she is both laughing and crying and Tina swings open the window, barely missing her head and throws the egg sandwich in her face. The child moves like lightening, darting up the path, temporarily out of range. By now we are all on our feet. Tina fetches a raw egg from the kitchen and goes into the back garden with it hidden behind her back 'Rachel, come here darling, come here babes'. We laugh: the small girl holding her own, determined not to give up. As Rachel's frustration and humiliation reach a frenzy she begins to sob and then, between admonishments that she is soft to cry and she'll get a good belting if she does, Vron and Tina cuddle and comfort her. As we leave the house and head towards the town centre, Rachel asks Tina if she can stay at her house tonight and Tina lifts her up and tells her she can.

Through these two different ways of working I understood that the filmmaking I’m happiest with has potential in it for what you could call continuous practice –things unfold through the making, and you follow idea through that process, not knowing exactly what outcome will be.  Explicit or verbally articulated thought and understanding sometime occur afterwards – or another way to put it would be thinking through making rather than a practice where you think as a way of making –where you plot the course something will take before doing it through e.g. theory or drawn plans or shooting script.

But I also saw that this wasn’t always most appropriate method for some kinds of circumstances.

I think there is need to reflect on the kind of approaches you are comfortable with and whether you might want to challenge those – what other methods there might be, why you are attached to some over others, how you might extend yourself.


Beautiful Colour
Reverie, play and making
Moving closer to present I showed  a film I’d made in 2009-10 called Beautiful Colour.

This took me back to a theme evident in Peter’s Stone God  – making – but in Beautiful Colour I was more consciously interested in the relationship between making, play and reverie.

 Click here to see 'Beautiful Colour'

Thinking back to what we are comfortable with – the thing I did differently in this film was to place far more conscious limitations on what and how I filmed – to only film in Ian Partridge’s part of studio, not to try and explain  what happened outside that space, but to leave that to the viewer’s imagination. I wanted to focus on the place where Ian has some real autonomy.

In terms of ethical considerations and access. I made this film with my sister who was the producer and who works with Ian. Permission for the filming was given on Ian’s behalf by his advocates who felt that it would benefit him as an artist.  There were issues about other clients at the artbarn where the film was made not getting in frame as we had no permissions for them to appear. Again the method was to stay close, to think about continuity in editing, not to ask Ian things or interview him but to try and enter into the space of making with him. 

I learnt a great deal from making this film – about play -- open play rather than purposeful play.  It encouraged me to begin to draw again after twenty or more years of doing very little. Other people often say that seeing Ian work makes them want to paint – it makes it seem within reach, more possible.

Ian was not very interested in the film – he saw it when it was finished and also attended a screening of it at the BigScreen in Norwich.  But it has had some positive benefits for him – I showed the film to Bryony Bond the curator of a big exhibition of outsider art at the Whitworth Gallery in Manchester and she realized after viewing it that she had work by Ian in the Musley Kinsgrove collection. As a result she decided to show Ian’s work along with the film at the exhibition.

Videoing Ian led to the last film I showed which was made in India and is called Entry . Ian’s playfulness as an artist helped me see possibility of doing this more proactively as a filmmaker.


Entry

Click here to see 'Entry' http://vimeo.com/19328902

Entry was made during a month-long residency at Arts Reverie, an artist’s house in Ahmedabad that brings Indian makers and international artists together in various exchange programmes. Arts Reverie is located in one of approximately 600 ‘pols’ found on the east side of the city of Ahmedabad. Pols are high density neighbourhoods that were once homogeneous communities associated with different castes but are today increasingly diverse.
The project team consisted of three UK researchers - Cj, Amanda and the artist Steven Dixon (principal investigator); and two Indian researchers  - the artist Lokesh Ghai, who took the role of project manager (and who was also collaborating with Steve on a separate project for the AIAF), and Palak Chitaliya who had consulted with local people about environmental conditions on previous occasions and had good relationships with people living in Dhal ni Pol. Our attempts to get to know people were helped by the timing of our visit which coincided with Navratri (8), a festival of nine nights, which is celebrated in part through dancing each night, something we enjoyed joining in with.

The film came about through Cj wanting to find visual stories with which to decorate chai ceramics and me wanting to find a way to further my work on reverie and play. Through various discussions we arrived at an idea for an event which would take place over one day – a doorway would be set up in a public space and people would be invited to interact with it while I recorded material from a fixed point and Cj took photographic portraits. 

We set up the doorway outside his house, in the street, on the auspicious day of Dussehra (the festival that ends Navratri.

On my last night when having screened the film, someone who had taken a large part in the filming was angry that I had not given him a dvd with everything I had filmed on it, rather than just giving him the edited film. I had been unable to fit all the material onto one dvd in time and the material has since been supplied, but this moment revealed how at this point of leaving, we were or seemed to be appropriating something. We know that ownership is a big issue in research and in ‘socially-engaged’ art and its something that Cj and I have written about at more length in a book called Collaboration Through Craft that is coming out with Berg in 2013. I also have to ask myself whether the way I make films allows an audience to move beyond seeing the people in the film as stereotypes, fixed entities, or as objects, so to not close thought down or misinform audiences in ways that are damaging to people or situations who the films represent.

Conclusion
The talk concluded by revisiting the question of making – the 3 kinds of making mentioned at the start -  material making, film making especially regarding relationships; and reverie and play as states associated with making. What joins them together for me is the possibly of connection and even some kind of dissolution between self and other, self and world.

So film as a kind of making, for me is about fluidity and movement where I can hopefully stop looking at myself and look at world – MacDougall puts it like this “simply to look, and look carefully, is a way of knowing that is different from thinking. This not necessarily a matter of greater concentration, for often the more we concentrate, the more we only see ourselves. Concentration is not the same as being attentive and free of distractions…paying attention is not a matter of projecting oneself onto things-in-themselves but of freeing one’s consciousness to perceive them (from The Corporeal Image. (2006: 7).

Monday, 26 September 2011

A Practitioner's Perspective - Robin Blackledge


'Working with Diverse Audiences' - Talk & Presentation May 2011


Fabrica May 2011- Rendezvous Programme - FABRICA


This is a synopsis of a 90 minute presentation with some additional thoughts.


• talk was given to an intimate peer group audience made of of artists and health professionals


- As audience settled a video entitled 'The Passion' by Rosemary was on screen


Note - All audio-visual material has been granted permission by the contributors for public viewing.







I was happy to be invited by Fabrica to give this talk as I felt that it was time to reflect on my work in healthcare both as a practitioner creating art & design for health environments and also as part of a large psycho-social team, as artist-in-residence in Trinity Hospice, London. This team delivered a varied care package to individuals & families both in hospice and as outreach. I am now seeking ways to 'converge' this broad experience working within relevant positions or pro-actively initiating further projects



Background


My 25 year career in the arts began with a 10 year period working as a Performance artist creating live installations where the audience had an important interactive role in shaping the direction of choreography, space and environment. This performance and subsequent physical theatre work generally required and thrived from audience participation and manipulation, sometimes to the point whereby my safety as a performer was compromised. It was definitely a time of testing my emotional and physical thresholds, whilst at the same time exploring established boundaries between audience and performer. In certain street performances I was bottled, physically threatened and assaulted. In more controlled environments I was fortunate to have some memorable experiences and audience contact which I continue to this day to process and contemplate both as protagonist but also with those that shared it.


My interest in healthcare lies within the opportunity to effect positive change in the built environment. My early work in performance, I believe, shapes how I view public buildings, their daily cycles, and the myriad of roles played out within by the staff and users. As an artist working on these environments, one has to be aware of what is expected of you, and act accordingly. In projects where lead artist roles are required to develop an art and design strategy within new build or large refurbishment projects, this role is pre-defined, and the artist takes on more of a consultancy role and is usually a member of a core design team. In later years I ventured into 'Public, digital and interactive art' and now have made a body of art & design work which has been made calling upon skills & experience gained in various methods of art production.


Artist's sometimes can't help themselves but challenge entrenched forms of institutional behaviour and can act as an important bridge between stakeholders, staff and third party interests in the design process. In institutions which are in a sensitive transition process, for example a move from old buildings to new...they can act as creative brokers between 'the public' and the organisation, yet still retain authenticity within an individual approach. People in the Uk still feel a strong sense of ownership of the NHS and it is this passion that should be harnessed to design and build environments which are models of best practise for all stakeholders.



We also have to be mindful that sometimes all hospitals want and need is some good art & design…and why should we argue with that? There is a growing body of evidence that supports the need for good basic art & design in healthcare environments. There isn't one research body that collates all this research but a good place to start looking is the Arts Council's literature review which is dated 2004.


http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/publication_archive/arts-in-health-a-review-of-the-medical-literature/.


When you begin to dig, you can find much research to back-up most forms of creative activity within hospitals and healthcare. However, it is very dry research and there remains a large vacuum for a researcher to compile a publication on this interesting area....perhaps it is being written as I am writing this. It wouldn't hurt to do some serious scientific research into the effects of lighting, wall colour, good design & way-finding etc.


I believe that simple changes can bring huge benefits. For example...I have been in situations where I have proposed the specifying of one or two brighter colours for a 400 metre long corridor rather than an off-white or magnolia, these are the spaces that affect peoples lives moods and focus for 365 days a year, day-in day-out. This might sound simple...it is not, and can be an uphill struggle to even effect minor changes within a large institution.


Most of the work in larger projects is hidden and forms the prosaic tasks of designing, managing, producing, advocating and installing artwork which has been rubber stamped by committees, fund-raisers and users. The culture of art & design production is changing thankfully to from an 'us & them' approach to artists being part of a core design team. This saves time, money and presents opportunities where art can be built into the fabric of the building rather than an after thought.


There are many scenarios where this experience can be utilised. In large hospital new

-builds, for example, consultation with users and staff is part of the lexicon of design & build. Stakeholder representation and input is now embedded in hospital culture. However, this also creates another new layer of management…more meetings, more demands on staff schedules, so it must be done with sensitivity to existing managerial frameworks.


Few architects, designers or artists have intimate knowledge of the raised anxiety levels, emotional stress or physical ailments that are presented every day to health practitioners and carers. However it is safe to assume that all of us will at some stage of our lives, whether that is to give birth, be treated for an injury in A & E, or visit a relative or family member being treated for an illness, use the services of our health service.


This is why the healthcare environment is of interest to me. It serves everyone, it is incredibly diverse in the care delivered and the physical spaces which deliver the care, and the Uk is going through a seismic psychological shift from smaller care centres to huge regional hospitals that provide a whole range of care under one roof. The Uk is also suffers from a plethora of older buildings ranging from pre-florence nightingale to the present day. It is an area of design, architecture & design which can have a direct and tangible subliminal or psychological impact on the building user, hopefully in a positive way.



BHOC (Bristol Haematology & Oncology Centre) - a recent healthcare Project



- a short evaluation of my most recent project where I acted as 'Lead Artist' on an art & design refurbishment for the BHOC.


Various art & design solutions where employed to maximise the potential of an existing budget of approximately £50,000 to provide uplifting environments for reception areas, waiting rooms and art installations that provided orienteering mechanisms within the building. A way-finding strategy was also developed that used large vinyl graphics as floor level markers for life exits and stairwells.


Broad range of approaches were used within existing and immovable design specifications, including photographic original prints & narratives derived from authentic artistis research in the cal environment, thus embedding the imagery within a local framework. Bespoke artworks (MUG installation, Quilt artwork & Lift Light-box works), Large vinyl wall graphics & bespoke laminate tables. It also included large portions of stakeholder consultation and contributions to various artworks. This project has been short-listed for a Building Better Healthcare (BHH) award (Best use of Visual arts in healthcare) to be announced in November 2011. http://www.bbhealthcare.co.uk/show.php?

page=story&id=1918&story=1918





















Palliative Care Work


I come from family who have almost 100% (on one side) been involved in medical care or health provision in many forms so it seems natural for me to be involved in this field of work.


I was originally appointed as a 'digital artist in residence' at Trinity by Rosettalife, an organisation who has an impressive track record of initiating creative placements and projects within palliative care environments. Now, a few years on, many artists who had posts within hospices have suffered from the economic pressures of the times and have had there contracts terminated. But let's move on from talking about the economic times we live in...this work immediately presents us with difficult scenaros.


How do you enagage someone in a meaningful way, culturally and emotionally amidst the baggage and clinical reality of dying.


PAIN / FEAR / ANXIETY / MEDICATION / FAMILY LOVED ONES / CARE STRATEGIES / FUTURE PLANS WILLS / GETTING THROUGH TODAY

"I feel like an investigative journalist, searching for kernels of truth and armed with only a camera, trying to get decent footage with little time amongst the whirlwind of clinical terminal care..."


Chris Rawlence - Director of Media Rosettalife.



There are many contradictions that surface whilst working as an artist within institutions. On the one hand, I saw for myself how energising and positive creative intervention at the final stages of life can be. On the other hand, from a clinical perspective, why should it be the responsibility of a hospice/healthcare institution to deliver forms of creative contact, explore the meaning of life, or exploring one's identity (for example)? In 2008 the government published the 'End of Life Strategy'. A report that states that amongst many objectives, we need to provide services that are more person centred, that cater for the needs of a highly complex society. Art & creative intervention can act as a bridging mechanism between user and management in palliative care and other healthcare scenarios. It allows us to all think of ourselves as 'significant individuals' within a system where we are all stakeholders.


A social worker who shall remain nameless for issues of confidentiality once said of Trinity Hospice (although I'm sure he wouldn't mind being named) -


" What this place needs is more Sex, drugs & Rock & Roll"
This translates as -
If we are to care diligently for a age of people with lifestyles then who are we to say what they get up to in their private rooms? We did actually get a visit from Lemmy from Motorhead as he was visiting an old friend. I would have got his autograph if only I'd have been on duty…(provokes thought of new Kronenburg advert..yes we all have to slow down sometime.) http://youtu.be/khJKq_kJK7Q



Some people I have been privileged to have worked with.


Note on Equality of care.


How does one give equal care to a broad range of backgrounds, narratives and wide range of extreme physical decline? Contact time ranged from years to 5 minutes. How do you train to be able to engage in a meaningful way with a 32 year old crack addict mother of two on high dosages of pain relief (& therefore 'medicated'), who is about to die? Surely the time spent attempting engagement is as important if not more, than the creative products of work with people who understand the lexicon of creative expression. The majority of people I worked with had not done anything creative (in their opinion) since they had been at school.


You do what you can, you listen, act and attempt to make contact or dialogue. You try to make something even a small audio recording. You try to make something more substantial if there is a will and a way. Sometimes witnessing is enough and incredibly important.


I played a short audio recording of an 83 year old woman who had needed someone to witness her story of being sent by her mother to England, aged 12 from Vienna. Her mother and some of her immediate family subsequently died in Nazi concentration camps. Her reason for wanting to document this was because everyday of her life she had felt incredible guilt about not being able to save her mother and aunt. In her words, she had lived a 'nightmare' everyday of her life because of her guilt. I believe that she had not been able to discuss this with anyone during her lifetime and the recording was passed on to her family at her request.




DAVID


David is one of the first people I worked with and because of this had a relationship lasting three years. He was someone who used his predicament to lobby those in positions of influence to effect positive change both in the hospice movement and within his local borough of Lambeth. He gained notoriety for this approach and our work became part of this process. He had burmese carers so naturally was interested in the Burmese uprising in 2007 so we agreed to make a short film of shaving his hair off in solidarity with the Burmese monks. This became also a potent metaphor for his own story, purification or preparation for death. Most days he wore a shirt emblazoned with "I'm not dead yet". This was a visual response to everyone that asked him "How are you today?", using ironic humour to mock our inability to discuss debilitating illness in a straightforward way. I asked him how he would prefer to be greeted...I suggested " How don't you do?" as a possible replacement.


We filmed with the help of a PHD student Naomi Richards in an ad-hoc studio set-up in his sheltered accommodation communal hall, taking a series of stills throughout the process. I chatted to him atempting the role of a mockney barber and asking him about the troubles in Burma. The result was a time-based auto portrait that simply plotted his evolution from hirsuit to shaven headed. It has no audio and allows us the audience to see david in a state of metamorphosis, the context of his illness hints of changes to come and the transition that we all must make from our physical state.







The resulting limited editioned print was used as a calling card and Boris Johnson amongst others now own a copy, given to him when being lobbied by David.


Clemon

A series of interviews were made with Clemon that catalogued his life story and his struggle with coming to terms with various cancers over a 19 year period. This was scripted into a video work in which he will play the role of himself, using a clever combination of fact and fantasy to beguile the audience and intentionally lead them into exploring their own mortality, future and state of health. this image shows him performing one of of the characters in this world.

























Lyn

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2007/sep/20/guardianobituaries.health

"my father once said to me...the brain is like a freshly-mown lawn, whereby if you tread in it the grass will spring back to the shape it was.."

Lyn was a prominent neuro-psychiatrist and roughly the same age as myself when I met her. In her career she made important research into the effects of dopamine on the brain amongst many other strands of research. This was ironic to her as she battled with a brain tumour. I made a series of interviews with her that were intended for family to perhaps give them an opportunity for reflection in the future. I decided that her stories would be better served by using them in tandem with abstract imagery, to enable us to focus on her words and to give them another framework. This tableau was created by Lee Dyer in collaboration, a graphic artist and filmmaker. The moving imagery was a creative response to a conversation I had with her about how her sight at times failed her as the tumour began to affect her sight.




Terri


Theresa used her work with me as a bridge to talk about how she felt day to day within her own personalised care strategy. She suffered from the degenerative disease of Motor Neuron Disease (MND), a disease with a usual prognosis of death within 4 years from detection. She had long relationship with the hospice and her eventual death affected everyone that had worked with her over her time as an out-patient and inpatient. I assisted her in making portraits of herself, no, correction…portraits of the objects that she has used or assisted her during her physical decline. She then used this image, with my assistance as a way of discussing between departments, how she felt that she was 'seen' by staff within the hospice. We like to say things like, 'You are so brave Theresa' but all she wanted to express was the fact that most days she felt crap and weak, and not at all …brave. This inter-departmental meeting hosted by myself with theresa surprised everyone by allowing an outpouring of emotion from everyone in the room, a moment of release that was refreshing in an environment where it is difficult to speak the truth for fear of upsetting anyone.




'Nippy' - Terri © 2010































Anna


Anna was gravely ill and did not suffer fools gladly. She had written poetry ever since she was young. I don't not know how many people have read her poetry in her lifetime. She needed, but didn't ask for, help to type, edit, design a simple layout for a book and publish it online...where it now resides to be bought by anyone. It exists as a testament to her mysterious life and work.


I read one of her poems to finish this presentation, and realised that as I spoke, it might have been the first time anyone else has heard her written words...almost a premonition. She wrote the poem aged 25.




Poem written Bedford Styvensen Brooklyn N.Y.C 1981

for Eileen Orwell & me



These tragic women

whose tragedy is my own

and not my own

Who die in northern England

nursing homes

of cancer

when dusk is falling


Who fade on remote country estates

of terror shock and sheer heartbreak

when their one child is murdered

by the rougher males

in Brixton or Eton

these women of the haunted eyes

and secret sorrows

and buried lies

lost in unshed tears

as grey as England

as cruel and un cried

as those whose gaze i cannot bear

whose dreadful power loss I share

even as I thank the God


I was born far away in warmer shores

bearing blood of a different race

whose hatreds I will also

not escape


I pray that when I die

I may learn to die not like them

spare me the deaths of English women

in the secret cells

of grieving at the cruelty

and coldness

pitched beyond believing



Let me not fade away

in that dreadful unclaimed sorrow

where land dissolves beneath your feet

in hideous slow motion

onto the crumbling suns and sins

and sons of England

in dishonest ancient Britain

Down and out

in Paris, History, or London



Synopsis



Many institutions do not have an open culture of debate, where positive contributions can be discussed and a natural dialogue between staff and management creates an exciting culture and creates it's own momentum. This is unfortunate for those who wish to modernise or improve the overall quality of holistic care.


Most complimentary services in healthcare are entrenched in inter-departmental tension, each vying to be taken seriously, each competing for funds (more so since the 2008 recession) alongside important clinical provision. In my opinion a progressive organisation should have an open culture of debate, allowing new ideas to flow naturally and help in the modernisation of societies' attitude towards death & dying, an ageing population and ultimately the provision of better care, in keeping with the goals of the End of Life Strategy.


I do not see creative intervention as 'complimentary' - nor do I consider therapeutic massage, counselling, bereavement work and other forms as 'complimentary'.


This devalues it substantially and the origin of the language perhaps hails from 80's corporate culture…as if it is a complimentary biscuit on the side of the saucer of the all important clinically proven tea & coffee. I speak as an ITEC trained masseur so I know the numerous benefits massage can have.